Archive | TV Film RSS feed for this section

Lady Gaga: Meat Me Half Way

14 Sep

It wasn’t enough she got flack for wearing a bikini made of red meat for a Japanese photo shoot, so Lady Gaga beefed up her costumicktry at the MTV VMA’s receiving her award in a full red meat dress with a steak hat balanced on her marketing brainiac noggin. This animal-lover was furious with the gratuitous display of animal butchery by the megashiny pop star, but still had room to be confused by her speech: “I promised that if I won this award (sniff sniff!), I would announce the name of my new song.” One mystery still unsolved, and now this. We’re supposed to pay homage with an award to be rewarded by her “sneak peaking” her new song’s name that we inevitably will buy and download by the party yacht-full anyway? Lady Gaga makes me stop think and question things, all right.

Image: Vogue Hommes Japan

SITE IMAGE NOTICE: The images used on this website are believed to be public domain. If you feel any of these images or videos are violating your copyright, please contact (popsmartszen@gmail.com) and we will remove them as soon as possible.

© 2010 Simone da Rosa and PopSmarts™. All rights reserved.

Plan Ahead Immortal Plastic Surgery

7 Sep

Once upon a time gubernatorial candidate and charming hubby of the ailing 93 year old Zsa Zsa Gabor (who’s been in and out of the hospital since her July hip break she suffered in the couple’s Bev Hills casa), Prince Frederic von Anhalt, wants to immortalize his wife’s body via plastination after she dies. He hopes anatomist Gunther von Hagens, the puppetmaster behind controversial Body Worlds exhibitions, will do the deed. “My wife has always dreamed that her beauty would be immortal.” He wants to capture her in the context of one of her famous movie scenes. Gabor’s film credits includes appearances in movies such as 1952′s “Moulin Rouge” and Orson Welles’ “Touch of Evil” in 1958.

You give new meaning to the phrase “plastic surgery” and real hubster love (of PR) and beauty adoration, von Anhalt. So great to be loved not for what you look like…ever after.

Read more.

SITE IMAGE NOTICE: The images used on this website are believed to be public domain. If you feel any of these images or videos are violating your copyright, please contact (popsmartszen@gmail.com) and we will remove them as soon as possible.

© 2010 Simone da Rosa and PopSmarts™. All rights reserved.

Share

Smart, Practical Girls

6 Sep

3-2-1…Cue talent! Perennial cutie (I mean that in the very best ways) Drew Barrymore knows how and when to step off and take a Time Out with(-in) her relationship with Justin Long. In fact, the actress and producer of hip chick-power flicks like the ridiculously awesome and made-me-polish-my-wheels ‘Whip It’ , makes and uses her own self-help cards for when they’re just not into each other . Hers say things like, “I love you,” and “Five minutes” — a huge PopSmartsZen cheers to a woman who knows how to make potboiler movies, not relationships.

♣  ♥  ♦

Shopping List: buy a sense of humor, Madonna. Richie Rita, ya can’t afford not to. The material girl is mad she’s known and pointed out on the streets by strangers as The Material Girl. After her 1985 song by the same name (c’mon, Madge!, who didn’t understand it was an ironic commentary of the times and female power?), she’s pissed (and I don’t mean Brit for “drunk”) that people who don’t know her call her by this moniker, suggesting she is materially obsessed. Now, I love a girl after my own heart and I love Madonna — Ms. Ciccone says that while she’s not materialistic, she does love beautiful things — I get that! And thoroughly believe in it. It’s called, sing it with me: embracing the paradox. — PopSmarts

Image: Sire Records distributed by Warner Brothers or Madonna herself — not PopSmarts who’s just connecting dots visually here. But here’s the latest on worth of a name for the MG.

♣  ♥  ♦

SITE IMAGE NOTICE: The images used on this website are believed to be public domain. If you feel any of these images or videos are violating your copyright, please contact (popsmartszen@gmail.com) and we will remove them as soon as possible.

© 2010 Simone da Rosa and PopSmarts™. All rights reserved.

Share

“Surrogates” You, Only Perfect

3 Sep

This is not a movie but an existentialism review. “Surrogates” a Bruce Willis sci-fi B-movie, for me raised some grade-A questions about our flawed human existences: What does it mean to be human; What would you explore from the comfort of never leaving your home; What could you be if you were perfect — and Would the world actually be a better place if we were all perfect? Stretches of this flick feature Willis as a flawless-skinned, freaky blond wig-wearing Surrogate (e.g., robot) detective in the near future where the crime rates are down 99% in a society where the “real” people/Operators live through their “surrogate” robots/units, which represent them and dominate in the Real World.

Genuinely Fake

The best bits include when a hot hunky unit shows himself to wildly misrepresent his shaloompa oompa real life Operator — just like most trawlers at online dating sites. And then there is Willis’ screen wife’s perfect surrogate whose bears no resemblance to her burnt out Operator’s dysfunction and broken down addictions. [Potential spoilers alert!, stop reading here if you intend to see this movie and want to be surprised. Beyond that, I'm trusting that if you are reading this, you are bona fide REAL Operator who gets the meanings I try to put out there about the empowerment of tuning IN in our media-pop culture. Mamacitas, in the vernacular of this film, you are most likely coded to your own neural signature!]

Tuning IN to Feel Your Self Up

I’m para-quoting a pivotal speech by anti-surrogate leader, the Prophet (Ving Rhames): “When you sacrifice your own personal desires to the greater cause, a greater good, you never die…you never disappear. That is what it means to be human. You can try to escape by living through a puppet…but deep down inside you know you’re living a lie. …we know the truth. We sacrifice many modern pleasures and conveniences to feel truly connected, not with machines, but with ourselves. This is the human condition. This is what gives life meaning. My friends, soon will come the day when surrogacy must end. That day, I promise you is close at hand. The day we get a second chance.” Whoa, deep, dude. Later when Willis’ real Operator character gets a beating from his bodyguards, the Prophet says, “It’s different when you actually feel the pain, isn’t it?”

So in our days of climate change and personal and global financial crises, this timely popcorn movie made me think hard about the eternal Why am I here and How do I roll?- existential questions that haunt us humans — uhh, at least if, as Carrie Fisher puts it, you’re culturally lucky enough to have time to have such “high class problems.”

When I’m feeling off my game and need to deal with very human angst , I log off and tune IN to listen to my body’s wisdom. What is it telling me about how I actually feel about how cleanly I’m living my life on all levels, female aging in our culture, or when I eff up small- or big-time with someone? What are the states of my stomach (related to 3rd chakra), neck (5th) or chest (4th) trying to tell me? I breathe deeply and consciously send a healing golden light wherever needed, breathing in the energy of self-acceptance and repeat, “When I know better, I do better,” and breathing out anxiety and self-doubt from the affected places. Ten times is a meditation. I thank my body’s wisdom and guidance.

How do you embrace your imperfections? Own your flawed humanity? Or while you’re developing that skill as habit, how do you represent your best self out in the Real World? Are you a misrepresentin’ Surrogate (including cosmetics, diet, Spanx utilitarianism, plastic surgeries), or do you spend your valuable life denying a dysfunction (until it maybe manifests as a dis-ease)? Does your Operator self-numb with, or aggressively disdain technology (texting, or the much-aligned TV)? Is it possible to ever feel 100% free to be ourselves, aging, sagging, smart-alternately-not-so-smart selves as our true flesh and blood Operating selves? Another way to ask this question is: Do you walk your talk more than half the time?

Image: Disney, Touchstone Pictures

SITE IMAGE NOTICE: The images used on this website are believed to be public domain. If you feel any of these images or videos are violating your copyright, please contact (popsmartszen@gmail.com) and we will remove them as soon as possible.

© 2010 Simone da Rosa and PopSmarts™. All rights reserved.

Share

All in the Dysfuctional Family

12 Aug

Three decades ago, All in the Family started the controversy ball rolling by featuring Archie Bunker’s barking bigotry against the backdrop of his quarrelsome yet loving family. That was a new and shocking dose of reality in a sitcom, but the program I reeeally came to love was the first family-featured reality show The Osbournes (MTV, 2002-2005) starring rock star Ozzy, his wife Sharon and two of their kids — because they reminded me of my own family in so many ways — uh, sans the rock-n-roll drugs, bats, goth crosses and non-housebroken dog pack, that is. What I instantly recognized was their snappy loud-mouthed, high functioning family dynamic.

The phrase “dysfunctional family” is as misunderstood and misused as the word  “karma” by our culture. Webster’s defines dysfunctional it as “not functioning normally or properly,” and Buzzle.com defines it in more psychological and sociological terms: “…A disastrous unit where repeated malfunctioning is the rule.” Yet its misusage by so many if not most people appears to indicate that they think it includes family yelling or the drunk relative at holiday time. While constantly speaking very loudly to each other may signal a mindlessly ingrained poor habit and/or a familial cultural reflection, what I really wonder is: Does a media-pop culture that increasingly abuses the phrase “dysfunctional family” do so from paucity of actual functional role models, fueled by an encouragement of its own judgmental narrow-mindedness? Simply put, does watching families (and couples) fight on TV make us feel superior or at least better about our own situation(s)? Do we emulate in our relationships, and/or pass on what we “learn” from these show to our kids?

Dysfunction Junction

While The Osbournes show featured their wacky antics and animated family communications edited for entertainment value (I loved when their crazy ass high-drama included a regular percussive beat of Beep! over their offensive language), regular viewers could plainly see their obvious love for one another week to week. Heck, even Dr. Phil featured them on his stage and proclaimed them to be a loving and functional clan. How can a family that most of the general public labels as dysfunctional, be concluded as being a responsible, loving and functional family by professional observers, sociologists and doctors alike?

Ouch!: The Narrow-minded “Hug”

If the Osbournes are labeled “functional” maybe our media-pop culture/Ourselves need a new definition of the word dysfunctional. As I see it, “dysfunctional” is simply a term used by some therapists and show producers to heighten and sell drama as a something here needs to be “fixed” product. They’re not the only culprits: our widespread misuse and constant abuse of this word seems to give narrow-minded people (e.g., those feel the need to take their own personal life and standards and force them on everyone else. In a tolerant society, it’s necessary to learn that people who are not exactly like us are not necessarily “dysfunctional”) permission to apply it to new people and circumstances they know little to nothing about, have not dealt with in the past, and tend to be afraid to deal with in the present moving forward. In other words: Prime, USDM(-edia) Approved judgment sells shows, potentially unnecessary therapy(-ies), and goods.

New! and Imploded

Sure, historically there have been plenty of TV families (real and reality) for us to view: the blended Brady Bunch and single-mom Partridge Family were highly rate households alongside Bunker’s colorful nuclear clan, and much more recently, there’s the Kardashians (who I wanted to hate, but to whose genuine sisterhood-embracing antics I find myself often saying, “Right on, chicas!”).

However, now there’s a much more insidious trend emerging on the TV-family line up. If TV programs are meant to imitate or reflect life, what do current reality shows — now regularly starring formerly abused, addicted and/or victimized women, and including conveying sexuality in “survivor” terms — such as Kendra (E!) formerly of the Playboy Mansion, currently of her own reality shows fame (not to mention  the abusive antics of cast members on any of the ‘The Real Housewives’ (fill-in-the-city) series), say about our culture? Are there more of these shows purely for entertainment value and ratings, does this help shed light on formerly closeted issues, and/or is this increasingly a reflection of our culture’s grasp and practice of “relationships” and “family”?

Oh and, honey. This isn’t about simply turning it off or not watching. These shows ah sooow ohn! Everywhere. Your kids and their friends are watching. So…what shows — reality or otherwise — have best reflected your own family experience to you? How do they make you feel? Do you enjoy shows that feature people who seem more “broken” than you feel you and your family to be? If so own it but know: why? Do you feel our culture has become more, less dysfunctional, or stayed about the same, over the past decade?

Images: The Osbournes, MTV. Real Housewives of Atlanta, SlightlySarcastic.net.

SITE IMAGE NOTICE: The images used on this website are believed to be public domain. If you feel any of these images or videos are violating your copyright, please contact (simone.popsmarts@gmail.com) and we will remove them as soon as possible.

© 2010 Simone da Rosa and PopSmarts™. All rights reserved.


Share

Wish List: Celeb Look-alike Plastic Surgery

4 Aug

At the risk of sounding completely self-absorbed or vain, I’m going to put this right out there as I see it. I was considered a Pretty Girl growing up, getting regular praise for something completely out of my control and not of my core self — and as a result, feeling strangely uncomfortable about it from a very young age on. Maybe I didn’t totally believe it, or more likely I saw it as a very small window of “opportunity” relative to my lifetime, and so I actively and deliberately chose to work on developing my personality, sense of humor and personal growth in multi areas. I expect(ed) a lot of and for myself (as my mother drug-pushered onto me:) owing to my talents expressed as action of not hard but smart work. But enough about me. This is what I think about us.

Today’s self-indulgent yet self-hating vanity looks a lot like some sort of ‘50s, Stepford Wives, The Rules backlash to my Feminist 2.0 eyes. Let me be clear I am not against any cosmetic surgery if the person is doing this only for themselves and after real deliberation, and research and comparison (i.e., doctors’ Before/After computer renderings). As I believe myself to have stated clearly above, I’m all about enhancement and improvement! But our celeb culture shouts loudly that looks count. Only. So what do your lips, cheekbones, breasts and even your butt say about you? Do they say you are stylish, rich, sexually desirable, or insecure and dissatisfied? With the plastic surgery numbers as high as they are and only growing, it appears as if many Americans believe what our looks say about us is far more important to work on than what our personality — and its engine, our character — does. And more than ever, people are asking their surgeons for Angelina Jolie’s juicy mouth, or George Clooney’s strong chin, and reality show superstar Kim Kardashian’s bountiful booty, without any regard to appropriateness/fit at best, and distortion and the risk of psycho-emotional and physical pain, at worst.

Here’s the 411 for anyone unfamiliar with the recent Kim Kardashian-wannabe fan Twitter incident.

While Kardashian’s speedy response was lauded by (if not surprising to) many, and no one seems to dispute this fan is suffering from a scary case of SWF-syndrome, with a heaping tablespoon of low self-esteem folded into the mix, the CNN reporters‘ vapid so-called “debate” is truly what’s disturbing to me.

I would expect such insipid questions and this sort of trashy arguing on the Insider (with its shit stirring tag line, Which side are you on?) and ET but this faux Cross Fire exchange is only insightful to the very, very young or people with A.D.D. Can’t allegedly real news outlets fulfill their duty to be more responsible to their viewers by offering a more insightful look at the disturbing underlying cultural trends? I know how the business works but must it completely fail itself and us so often? No wonder the once-venerable (the Smart not Pretty Girl from the block) CNN is failing.

Again, they were pseudo-debating this “story” not “subject” — there’s a big difference, and it ain’t pretty so it doesn’t get much air time — its upshot is that our culture doesn’t promote real and sustainable self-esteem born of the work and achievement of inner beauty of average (that’s most of us, folks!) people (especially those of the beleaguered female gender). In fact, it’s deeply economically incentivized (fashion, cosmetics, elective surgery industries, et al) to perpetuate the beauty myth instead. And when you have a culture that values looks over character then is it any wonder more and more dissatisfied people behave as though they can buy happiness? …Sigh!…Then again…beauty does count to us mere humankies. What’s my diligent self-care when I feel overly consumed by someone’s looks over their talent, words, or real merit? It’s spirituality to the rescue for me as I run my deep breathing, clarity exercise imagining a beautiful glowing and white light of Truth running through my 3rd, 4th, 5th, the will power, heart and third eye chakras, and connect that light to their heart. And then I am more able to open my ears to the messenger.

What trend or subject(s) show you that our culture seems to dissuade developing actual self-esteem in girls and women? How have you found the beauty industry to be an ugly enabler of shallowness than to enhance one’s true confidence? Which news sources do you count of for a more in-depth, balanced look at our culture’s trends/our psyches?

SITE IMAGE NOTICE: The images used on this website are believed to be public domain. If you feel any of these images or videos are violating your copyright, please contact (simone.popsmarts@gmail.com) and we will remove them as soon as possible.

© 2010 Simone da Rosa and PopSmarts™. No materials may be used without expressed written permission.


Share

WIN! MOVIE TICKETS GIVEAWAY. Enter now!

27 Jul

Enter Drawing: Movie tickets in San Francisco! ‘The Sicilian Girl’ screening will take place on evening of August 12th at a LandmarkTheatre in San Francisco. Winners will be notified of exact location details.

THE SICILIAN GIRL is a fictionalized account based on the life and journals of Rita Atria, the determined 17-year-old daughter of a slain mob boss. After Rita, the first woman to do so, sees anti-Mafia judge Paolo Borsellino to denounce the system that is responsible for the murders of her father and brother, her days are numbered… This film is in Italian; fully subtitled in English.

View trailer.

To ENTER, email: PopSmartsZen@gmail.com with (* fields required for entry):

* NAME (first & last):

*EMAIL ADDRESS:

CITY/STATE:

How did you hear about this contest?

No purchase necessary. Winners will be notified by email August 9.

Share

Ah’ll Be Bach…

5 Jul

…I have  a terrible summer cold. In the lab for repairs. Thanks for your support! — PopSmarts

Image: The Sarah Connor Chronicles

SITE IMAGE NOTICE: The images used on this website are believed to be public domain. If you feel any of these images or videos are violating your copyright, please contact (simone.popsmarts@gmail.com) and we will remove them as soon as possible.

© 2010 Simone da Rosa and PopSmarts™. No materials may be used without expressed written permission.

Identity Crisis of a Lifetime (TV)

29 Jun

HOW “REALISTIC” IS THE PORTRAYAL OF WOMEN IN MEDIA?

Comedian/actor Tracy Morgan recently rolled his eyes and pithily called Lifetime Television “Man-bashing TV.” But now — awww! — our little girlie TV network is growing up! Lifetime grew out of her training bra (the notoriously sappy woman-as-victim-cum-redeemer Harlequinesque movies starring faded but still recognizable glamorzillas of evening serials), and is now swinging her Spanx-clad hips to the “realities” of Project Runway and Tori & Dean. The programmers at the Lifetime network are trying to attract a more hip and youthful female viewer — one who likes her designer dresses and the woes of celebrity mommyhood as much as her heroine’s redemption via the stalker’s/rapist’s/killer’s comeuppance in Act 3. Fine.

HAPPY MEDIUM

Why are women — at their “own” network, no less — portrayed as either victims or fluff heads? Are we more acceptable as cartoon characters? I’m all about a happy medium like Drop Dead Diva — a series about a smart, “real-woman” attorney who wakes up in the hospital inhabited/fueled by a recently deceased, body-swapped super model. Sounds eye-rolling, but I actually find that the tribulations of a formerly frumpy, intellegent woman learning to work her inner supermodel cleverly spotlights some real issues. Heavy hitters like Rosie O’Donnell, Paula Abdul, and the Bachelor’s Jake Pavela have made guest appearances, and the show (now in Season 2) co-stars Margeret Cho. Take a look.

FULL-ON GIRL POWER

Meanwhile, in feature film land, Danish filmmaker Niels Arden Oplev recently spoke Charlie Rose (that oasis of intellegent interview shows) about the challenges of making his abuse-victim-as-heroine film The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo (based on the wildly popular Steig Larsson book). He talked about how rewarding it was to see women in the screening audiences hoot and holler in a seeming battle cry of strong identification with the repeatedly abused central female character and her bold, never-ending self-preservation and strength. Oplev said he’d intended to make a Swedish Silence of the Lambs or a La Femme Nikita (two of my all-time feminist faves), and I’d say he succeeded. Other films in this spirit include the original Alien and Long Kiss Goodnight, the identity-crisis allegory starring Geena Davis (founder of the Geena Davis Institute on Gender in Media). Check out these flicks again with fresh eyes — there’s definitely something more to these characters than sheer ass-kicking.

IDENTIFYING INSPIRATION

Despite the fact that my progressive caveman hubster scoffs at such movies as being “unrealistic” (uh, because the James Bond or Mission Impossible films are totally rooted in reality?), I stay inspired, empowered and fresh when I expose myself to films where I know the physical prowess of the heroine is usually just a visual medium’s analogy of her strength of character and mental toughness — which, in my experience of many real women out there, IS realistic! The female intelligence, emotional resilience, wily self-preservation, savvy know-how, and inspiring balancing acts featured in these films are spiritually renewing for me. They tickle my third chakra and remind me to celebrate these qualities within myself, and that I can BE and want more.

Share with me how media portrayals of girls and women make you feel. Have you ever been made to identify with an abuse victim, a fashion slave, a perfectionist mommy, fat and ugly, or some other extreme and unrelalistic caricature? What identifying media or pop culture moments have shaped, changed, or mirrored you, and have stayed with you to this day?

Image: abcpoet

SITE IMAGE NOTICE: The images used on this website are believed to be public domain. If you feel any of these images or videos are violating your copyright, please contact (simone.popsmarts@gmail.com) and we will remove them as soon as possible.

© 2010 Simone da Rosa and PopSmarts™. No materials may be used without expressed written permission.


Share

‘Twilight’: More Dysfunctional Romantic Notions Coming Soon!

27 Jun

There’s a new moon ‘Eclipse’ on the horizon which makes this as good a time as any to discuss the unceasingly naive romantic notions that our movies and culture shove down the throats of girls, the worst of which center on – you guessed it – “relationships.”

Twilight shapes dysfunctional young girls

Let me be super clear that I’m not a Twilight hater, but I haven’t read any of Stephanie Myer’s series and I know that makes me an oddball (especially for a girl). So please pardon my self-acknowledged ignorance of the written material, but rest-assured that I’ve been informed clearly by those in the know that Myer does a great job of explaining “It” more fully in her books.  Greater, I hope, than the ways the movie franchise has so-far handled “It”: True Love.

From Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People:

Oh. My. God. The new Twilight: Eclipse (isn’t that a kind of gum?) poster is so emo, I fear it may actually try to cut itself. (Agent Bedhead) *

Exactly. In our culture, it’s not like there’s a plethora of healthy amorous relationships for young girls to emulate to begin with. How is any self-respecting girl supposed to grow up to be a self-respecting woman in relationships (and even before that, single or in her quest for them) when this influential franchise puts out such misleading messages? Note the post break-up depression scene in New Moon, with female lead Bella sitting catatonic in a chair, numb to the passage of time as the seasons go morosely by. This is as if to ask, what sort of life could this interesting girl possibly have without a boy/man (albeit a hot century-old one needing SPF 300 and fang tip protectors) to define her?

(And yes, I do remember being eighteen, but I might’ve been closer to thirteen when everything registered “10” on the Richter scale of drama. I suppose, on top of my rant about pop culture’s schmaltzy selling of True Love, I’m a bit oldschool in my wariness of enabling yet more psycho-emotional developmental retardation in Gen Y and younger. That can’t be good for them…or us…)

Moon Over Who I Am(mi)

When I was a teen, I connected with my future “perfect guy” by spiritually – and pragmatically – thinking about what qualifying qualities he would need: supportive of my vision and successes in life, a fully realized adult himself, and most of all… happy. I didn’t waste too much time on what he would look like, or if he would have to be rich, or what he would do for a living.  (For the record, I did seriously debate whether or not I could ever marry for money… My answer was ‘no,’ which meant I would have to go out and make my own money!)  To this day, I still spiritually conjure up what I want – and who I want – by knowing what does and doesn’t work for me.  I’ve realized that developing a sense of self is very spiritual and all about connecting to your highest purpose.

What do you think?

Have we been so deeply imprinted by cultural messages that we’ve become disconnected from our own thoughts and values enough that the media can dictate how we feel about — well, ourselves and what we look for in relationships? The Twilight series plot points remind me of reasons why a lot of grown women I know seem to be frustrated and perpetually searching for some ideal man who doesn’t exist outside a fantasy serial. These beautiful women are waiting around for the “rescue” (whether amorous, financial or otherwise) before they give themselves permission to start living fully. Am I just under-informed or overwrought about the harmful message in this movie franchise’s True Love messaging?

Please, enlighten me, Twilight freakistas. The example of oh-so-desolate Bella simply triggered my internal dialogue.  What do you think about the media’s harmful portrayal and perpetuation of True Love? Does the Twilight series fall in line with the rest of the negative relationship models out there?

* Since this article ran originally, I’ve been schooled that this sort of sarcasm is a dangerous exploitation of the self-harm that some people suffer from. That was and is not my intention, and I do not belittle the seriousness of such afflictions, but I leave the remark as is here for the expression that supports my article’s original point.

SITE IMAGE NOTICE: The images used on this website are believed to be public domain. If you feel any of these images or videos are violating your copyright, please contact (simone.popsmarts@gmail.com) and we will remove them as soon as possible.

© 2010 Simone da Rosa and PopSmarts™. No materials may be used without expressed written permission.


Share

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.